Santa Clarita Criminal Lawyer
Santa Clarita Criminal Defense Attorney About Us Common Questions Case Evaluation Testimonials Case Results Contact Us
Criminal Defense Practice Areas
Criminal Defense
Accused of a Crime?
Assault & Battery
DUI
Drug Crimes
Domestic Violence
Fraud
Hit & Run
Juvenile Crimes
Murder/Manslaughter
Theft Crimes
Three Strikes Law
Sex Crimes
Weapon Offenses
En Español
23929 W. Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, 91355
Find us on Facebook
click here to instantly connect to our office Watch our informative videos Read our blog

Miranda Does Not Apply in Probation Revocation Proceedings

The California Court of Appeals held  that the Miranda exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings.   ( People v. Racklin 2011 DJDAR 7220)   The defendant in the case appealed from a judgment imposing a four-year sentence in state prison following the revocation of his probation.   Leroy Racklin contended that the trial court should not have considered an admission elicited from him by police officers in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436.   The First Appellate District in affirmed the judgment of the trial court. The court held that the Miranda exclusionary rule is inapplicable in probation revocation proceedings in the absence of egregious conduct by law enforcement officers.

If you have been arrested for a violation of probation or know someone who has, please contact the Law Offices of David M. Wallin to speak with a Santa Clarita criminal defense attorney with a combined 50 years of criminal law experience representing thousands of people charged with probation violations.   

Categories: Probation Violation

Attorney Web Design

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.